tag:help.rubygems.org,2010-01-19:/discussions/problems/30854-owner-present-for-missing-gemRubyGems.org: Discussion 2018-04-19T17:43:40Ztag:help.rubygems.org,2010-01-19:Comment/449120962018-03-16T03:35:43Z2018-03-16T03:35:46ZOwner present for missing gem<div><p>The discussion shows, that even if the gem owner yanked all versions (but in this case there was only 1 version <a href="https://rubygems.org/gems/shrek/versions">https://rubygems.org/gems/shrek/versions</a> with version 0.2.0 ) of the gem on rubygems, the gem name is still owned by him.</p>
<p>The rubygems creator told me, that it is normal behavior, and I have to get in touch with rubygems admins to ask for free this gem name.</p>
<p>I can start versioning with next major version to prevent any possible collisions, if it can helps.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p></div>Mikhail Beliakovtag:help.rubygems.org,2010-01-19:Comment/449120962018-03-16T15:17:51Z2018-03-16T15:17:53ZOwner present for missing gem<div><p>resolved with gem owner</p></div>Mikhail Beliakovtag:help.rubygems.org,2010-01-19:Comment/449120962018-04-19T17:43:38Z2018-04-19T17:43:38ZOwner present for missing gem<div><p>Glad to hear it!</p></div>kerrizor