can't push gem - No stairway, denied!
Every time I try to push my new gem to gemcutter, I get HTML output containing the problem:
Server error.
No Stairway, denied!
<p>Looks like something blew up on our end. We've been alerted of the problem, but feel free to open up an <a href="http://help.rubygems.org">issue</a> if you want it fixed faster.</p>
This happens under both Windows XP and Linux (Ubuntu 9.10) using the latest rubygems (1.3.6) and the latest gemcutter (0.5.0).
Comments are currently closed for this discussion. You can start a new one.
2 Posted by sinisterchipmunk on 16 Mar, 2010 11:36 AM
In case it matters, the project was generated using newgem. Configuration is managed by hoe, which was the default, version 2.5.0. It also makes use of rspec and cucumber. It lists actionpack >= 2.3.5, activesupport >= 2.3.5 and hpricot >= 0.8.2 as runtime dependencies, and cucumber >= 0.6.2, rspec >= 1.3.0 and rcov >= 0.9.8 as development dependencies. I'm using Ruby v1.8.7 p248.
3 Posted by sinisterchipmunk on 16 Mar, 2010 11:48 AM
This issue may be related to:
http://help.rubygems.org/discussions/problems/96-getting-500-error-...
I don't have a workaround, however. I'm stuck on 1.8.7 for the foreseeable future. It should be noted that I've released 2 gems using 1.8.7 in the past, the more recent of which was on January 29, 2010. So something has changed since then.
If it comes down to a missing gem, I don't know what to look for. Here's my current gem env and list:
Support Staff 4 Posted by Nick Quaranto on 16 Mar, 2010 07:15 PM
Hey there,
Can you paste the output of
gem spec your-built-gem-that-fails.gem?5 Posted by sinisterchipmunk on 17 Mar, 2010 10:20 AM
Sure, see attached.
Support Staff 6 Posted by Nick Quaranto on 17 Mar, 2010 08:41 PM
So I'm seeing something strange in the description here:
Can you remove the \x91? I'm not sure yet why Gemcutter is barfing with that character but that might be it.
7 Posted by sinisterchipmunk on 18 Mar, 2010 11:15 AM
Not sure where \x91 came from, but that was the problem. All is fine, now.
Thanks!
David Radcliffe closed this discussion on 12 Apr, 2013 01:07 PM.